Worst ‘Shark Tank’ funding ever was the Breathometer

Over greater than a decade on ABC’s “Shark Tank,” billionaire Mark Cuban has seen his share of excellent investments — and unhealthy ones.

Final week, Cuban instructed the “Full Ship” podcast that after investing almost $20 million in 85 startups on “Shark Tank,” he is taken a web loss throughout all of these offers mixed. He tells CNBC Make It that the loss is just “on a money foundation” so far, and would not account for the truth that he hasn’t but exited lots of these investments: “I have never gotten out greater than I’ve put in. However that does not account for all the continuing, working companies and their valuations.”

On the podcast, Cuban shared the worst funding deal he is ever made on the TV present: the Breathometer.

In 2013, an entrepreneur named Charles Michael Yim went on “Shark Tank” to pitch his product, the Breathometer, as “the world’s first smartphone breathalyzer.” Yim wowed Cuban and the opposite Sharks by exhibiting off a smartphone attachment that he claimed may precisely measure blood alcohol content material (BAC).

Yim’s gave the Sharks glasses of champagne, after which had them blow right into a small, plastic system that would connect to a smartphone. Yim claimed the system may ship BAC degree readings to your telephone, and gave you the choice of calling a cab with the contact of a button in case your BAC degree was too excessive.

Charles Michael Yim pitches the Breathometer on ABC’s “Shark Tank” in 2013.

Kelsey Mcneal | Disney Common Leisure Content material | Getty Photographs

The pitch was compelling, and Yim grew to become the primary “Shark Tank” entrepreneur to tug in all 5 Sharks right into a joint funding. Cuban, Kevin O’Leary, Daymond John, Lori Greiner and Robert Herjavec pooled collectively a $1 million funding for a 30% stake, which valued Yim’s firm at $3.3 million.

“It was an ideal product,” Cuban stated final week. “However, the man – Charles – I might have a look at his Instagram and he’d be in Bora Bora … Two weeks later, he’d been in [Las] Vegas partying, after which he’d be on Necker Island with Richard Branson.”

“I might textual content him, like ‘What the f— are you doing? You are speculated to be working,'” Cuban stated. In response to Cuban’s recollection, Yim would reply that he was “networking” on behalf of the enterprise.

Cuban stated the excuse did not fairly maintain up: “Subsequent factor you understand, all the cash’s gone.”

By 2016, Yim was transitioning away from the Breathometer, partnering with well being care big Philips on a product known as Mint that measured ranges of sulfur compounds in your mouth to find out whether or not or not you had unhealthy breath.

In January 2017, the Federal Commerce Fee filed a grievance towards Yim and Breathometer, alleging that the corporate misled its clients concerning the product’s skill to precisely measure BAC. In response to the FTC, Breathometer “lacked scientific proof to again up their promoting claims.”

That very same month, Breathometer reached a settlement with the FTC over that grievance, forcing the corporate to inform and absolutely refund each buyer who’d purchased a tool. In response to the FTC, the corporate by no means carried out sufficient testing regardless of claiming that its merchandise had been backed by “government-lab grade testing.”

“That was my largest beating,” Cuban stated.

In response to Cuban’s allegations, Yim tells CNBC Make It that the “feedback had been utterly off [base],” and that he did not blow his firm’s cash on private journey. He additionally says it is “not honest” that Cuban would base his evaluation of Yim’s CEO talents on a collection of social media posts, and notes that his journey to Necker Island was to pitch the Breathometer to Richard Branson. The pitch was profitable, and Yim grew to become a 2015 finalist in Branson’s Excessive Tech Problem pitch competitors.

“You may’t have a look at somebody’s social media and take it for face worth,” Yim says. “That is not how social media works.”

Yim acknowledges not committing to correct testing for a few of his merchandise, and says that lack of rigor contributed extra to derailing his firm’s progress than his journey schedule. At the moment, neither the Breathometer or Mint merchandise can be found for buy on the corporate’s web site.

The founder notes that Cuban took the lion’s share of the funding, accounting for $500,000 of the overall $1 million. He says the Sharks may lastly recoup some worth from their funding, as a result of the corporate lately agreed to be acquired. Particulars for such a deal don’t but look like public.

Replace: This text has been up to date to incorporate a remark from Mark Cuban on his “Shark Tank” investments.

Disclosure: CNBC owns the unique off-network cable rights to “Shark Tank.”

Join now: Get smarter about your cash and profession with our weekly e-newsletter

Do not miss:

Why Mark Cuban known as this ‘Shark Tank’ CEO who introduced in hundreds of thousands ‘an ideal case for what to not do’

Barbara Corcoran to ‘Shark Tank’ start-up: This widespread psychological mistake is ‘the largest hazard’ to your success

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/07/22/mark-cuban-worst-shark-tank-investment-ever-was-breathometer.html

Previous post Credit score Suisse to call Ulrich Korner as its subsequent CEO – FT
Next post SEC expenses UBS, JPMorgan, TradeStation for id theft safety lapses